Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software Development House Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Software_Development_House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Software Development House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company per WP:COMPANY, no significant coverage online from reliable sources per WP:RS, conflict of interest per WP:COI (written by managing director of company). Prod contested by creator. MuffledThud (talk) 13:05, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 13:06, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 13:06, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. More of the same: an international company involved in the custom development of software. Sources found by automated search were not obviously about this business, and most were IT-related in any case. "References" supplied are to routine corporate filings. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No actual claim of specific cited notability for this company. Its main product is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Depression Anxiety Stress Test. DMacks (talk) 19:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete G4 Recreation of deleted page. Guinness (talk) 23:26, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, previouos deletion was speedy. Speedy Delete G11 - appears to be nothing more than an advert

• Speedy delete, author has serious conflict of interest issue and there are no indications of notability. Haakon (talk) 18:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete spam. Miami33139 (talk) 21:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.