Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snap table Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Snap_table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. I'm not sure how "Less Resources" is an argument to Keep an article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Snap table (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Snap Table seems to be a trademark of a particular tool, made by Swenson. I failed to find any mention of a generic use of the term in roofing. The particular tool does not seem to be notable, I have failed to locate any independent sources. Викидим (talk) 01:19, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Викидим (talk) 01:19, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete nothing significant there for the article to stay at main space and article is entirely unsourced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by O chawal (talk • contribs) 21:26, November 11, 2023 (UTC)

• Weak Keep Less Resources — Preceding unsigned comment added by CAJaganaddamRJY (talk • contribs) 06:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The only non-commercial reference to the term I was able to find is a Merriam-Webster dictionary definition, which has nothing to do with the roofing tool. Owen× ☎ 14:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.