Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smip Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Smip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 12:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Smip (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced neologism with no demonstration of notable usage. Can find no trace of this online apart from link in article to site of product with this name. Unreferenced, appears to be WP:PROMO of non-notable product. MuffledThud (talk) 09:40, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 09:42, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 09:44, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:54, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per WP:NEO. Warrah (talk) 04:55, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.