Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smartron Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Smartron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:11, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Smartron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A great many references, every one of them an apparent press release, in sources notorious for publishing such material. Created by now-banned sockpuppet -- see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amitabhaitc DGG ( talk ) 19:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unsourced commercial blurb. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:41, 17 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]
• delete promo puff sourced from promo puff. lacks significant coverage I reliable sources w/ rep for fact checking.Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 17:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just to add, I removed all puffery and unnecessary details. Wikipedia is not a marketing or advocacy platform, nor is it a substitute for a company's own website. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 17:35, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.