Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart Partition Recovery Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Smart_Partition_Recovery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:20, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Smart Partition Recovery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject qualifies deletion for not meeting the standard of inclusion because it lacks significant coverage in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 14:18, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 14:19, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. The only review is from software.informer.com and as this is a download site, it should not be considered independent. A search turned up a number of download sites, but no significant, independent RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• delete nowhere near significance or notability. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.