Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartXML Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SmartXML

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:51, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SmartXML

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Virtually no coverage online, and nothing that would meet the general notability guidelines. Largoplazo (talk) 02:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This seems to be a homebrewn framework to write XML pages. There is 0 coverage about it in reliable sources (or in general) and also 0 reception of the tool, even in NON-RS sources. It fails WP:GNG and WP:PRODUCT/WP:NSOFTWARE in all categories. It has apparently been made by some American software developer as home project according to his linked-in page. The editor who created the article is named similar to this guy. It seems to be some WP:PROMO article therefore. Dead Mary (talk) 08:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Fails WP:N. Source searches are providing no significant coverage in reliable sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 18:37, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.