Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siftery (2nd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Siftery_(2nd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G11). (non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 07:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Siftery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable early stage company. Lack of substantial coverage in reliable sources outside of WP:SPIP. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. Deleted through AfD earlier this year. Rentier (talk) 18:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Multiple sources from TechCrunch and NewsCo are not self-promotion or self-publicity contents. Please check the references before marking this as unremarkable.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tokegee (talk • contribs) — Tokegee (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Repeated coverage from tech publications and blogs in the US and around the world within a short timeframe has been established. Please do review references, which include a mix of publications with in-depth coverage and/or notable mentions. Johnleecg (talk) 11:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC) — Johnleecg (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 19:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.