Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shortest shared path problem Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shortest_shared_path_problem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 03:42, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shortest shared path problem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable original research. There are no hits for "Shortest shared path problem" in Google scholar and Google books. The article is referenced entirely to the personal website of the associate professor who is promoting these, and self-published sources (apparently conference posters, all but the first of which generate a "403 Forbidden" error). Sławomir Biały (talk) 12:40, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator.  --Lambiam 23:20, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Looks like an interesting problem but no secondary sources; I tried "shortest shared path" and "shared path problem" as well. History section is basically a bio of one person so self promotion not unlikely. I removed the forbidden links.--RDBury (talk) 02:13, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:00, 18 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]
• delete as WP:OR. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:27, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• If you search for "shared shortest path" you can find published papers e.g. [1]. I don't know if that's sufficient or secondary coverage. FuFoFuEd (talk) 19:26, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Doesn't seem directly related. —Ruud 11:05, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete then, because that's all I could find. FuFoFuEd (talk) 12:02, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Interesting, but non-notable, research. —Ruud 11:05, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.