mic_none

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shift Script Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shift_Script

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shift Script (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails General Notability Guideline, WP:NSOFT. Unable to find any sources that weren't self-published. External links are dead (2/3) or a webforum (1/3). Tagged for needing additional sources for nearly 7 years. ― Padenton|   08:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Search engine returns only this, which falls short of notability. Searching is hard, though, since many computer hits for "shift script" turn out irrelevant.
Note: of current references, the domain for reference 1 is dead, 2 has been permanently moved and link-rotted, 3 needs a forum login. Tigraan (talk) 11:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.