Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SharpChess Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SharpChess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SharpChess

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This software does not seem notable. A Google search did not find any reliable secondary sources. No references are given in the article. The author has not edited anywhere else than this article, except to place "SharpChess" in various other articles. SyG (talk) 09:55, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No notability stated. Little coverage in other sources beyond download sites and spamming to Internet Chess forums. Pit-yacker (talk) 14:01, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?}

Note The author of the article made some comments on the talk page Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/SharpChess. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 17:12, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.