Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sensu (computing) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sensu_(computing)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 13:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sensu (computing) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The source provided in the article just barely mentions the software and a quick Google search hasn't led me to any other articles that can prove its notability. MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}^(Contribs)(please reply using {{ping}},^{(unless this is on my own talk page)} otherwise I may not see your reply) 17:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete without prejudice to recreation later if significant coverage is found and if there's any attempt at all to make any sort of claim to notability. Wikipedia is not a database of things that exist. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable computer software. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.