Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Security Task Manager Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Security_Task_Manager

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:19, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Security Task Manager

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN product. Sources given in the article are a blog, a news site that returns a press release from 2004, and one mention in a free e-book. PC World did a one paragraph review, and that's about it. Company itself was deleted as NN. MSJapan (talk) 04:06, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - David Gerard (talk) 12:35, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 16:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a non notable SW product. If the company were deemed notable, it could have been a redirect. Not notable individually. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:11, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable software fails WP:NSOFT and even the company article was deleted.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is quite easy to find online coverage for a software. In this particular case, I found is really hard. Fails WP:NSOFT and WP:PRODUCT. The PC World article is simply inclusion in a list of software which I consider routine coverage. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.