Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seagull PHP Framework (2nd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Seagull_PHP_Framework_(2nd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seagull PHP Framework

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable software - Standard searches do not reveal enough significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Previous AFD in 2012 closed as no consensus -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 12:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't appear to be notable; no books, no independent web site presence. -- Mikeblas (talk) 13:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As with the last discussion, and the published books 1 and 2 On further investigation, both these 'books' are from Wikipedia articles. Change to abstain. Greenman (talk) 21:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 08:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unfortunately as my searches found a few results at News, Books and browser but nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 07:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.