Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scrumboard online tools Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Scrumboard_online_tools

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:24, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scrumboard online tools (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Reasoning was This list is made of unremarkable products. Consensus to decide from here.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 18:28, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Detele The list is essentially empty. I removed the products that don't have articles, in other words, the non-notable products, and that leaves three. Those three don't have any information about them. Of the dozen or so that were removed only one had any details. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:55, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 14:34, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Why do we relist articles like this? There is no real content to this article and it cannot conceivably be encyclopedic. The article doesn't even explain what a scrumboard is. Pburka (talk) 14:47, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Detele The list is essentially empty. I removed the products that don't have articles, in other words, the non-notable products, and that leaves three. Those three don't have any information about them. Of the dozen or so that were removed only one had any details. Also, no one cares enough about this article to discuss its existence. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:13, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Borderline A1/A3, not much in the way of context or content. ReverendWayne (talk) 15:46, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No content. No idea what this means. What is scrumboard? •••Life of Riley (T–C) 16:17, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. per Life of Riley. I have no idea what this article is about. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:42, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. article is not useful. Wxidea (talk) 17:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.