Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ScriptLogic Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ScriptLogic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ScriptLogic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional listing, with no sources for notability -- Entirely dependent on routine notices, including such obvious press releases as businesswire DGG ( talk ) 04:48, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 05:32, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 05:32, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 05:32, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yeah, sources fail WP:ORGIND etc. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:50, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per promotional listing. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 06:59, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete References fail WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH, topic fails GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 15:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.