Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saurus (programming language) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Saurus_(programming_language)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Saurus (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Only two sources are offered and both are WP:PRIMARY and thus unhelpful. Googling turned up absolutely nothing. Msnicki (talk) 15:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 17:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – According to the GitHub official site, "Saurus is under heavy development and is not currently suitable for real-life software development." Programming languages normally have to be used by someone other than their creators. WP:TOOSOON. – Margin1522 (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete. It seems no one has used this language or had commentary on it. Delete as non-notable. Piboy51 (talk) 14:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent refs. A search did not turn up any significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 18:35, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.