Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajan GCMS Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sajan_GCMS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 21:55, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sajan GCMS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is significantly made up of primary sources. I believe this article is neither notable nor has any reliable sources to support it. Further, it borders on advertising with just a few token statements put in to project a different view. Request AfD delete. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 05:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not affiliated in any way to Sajan or their partners, nor I intend to be in the future, if that is what you are implying. I merely published this article as part of the requirements from a localisation module in college. If my article mostly refers to the developer's website, it is only because there is little information available outside there. I believe my article should stay in Wikipedia because it summarises the tool conveniently. Jordibalcells (talk) 09:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Practically no independent coverage. Pcap ping 02:07, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 02:07, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, not notable. --Nuujinn (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete if the creator of the article says "If my article mostly refers to the developer's website, it is only because there is little information available outside there." then we have a real notability problem. David V Houston (talk) 16:24, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.