Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SWObjects Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SWObjects

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 21:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SWObjects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There seems to be only minimal evidence of notability - of the references listed, only three mention SWObjects (another is a broken link, so it's hard to say). Those three are papers, but only one appears to be from a peer-reviewed journal (BMC Bioinformatics), and that paper seems to mention SWObjects only briefly. All the papers are co-authored by the creator of SWObjects (who is also the creator and main author of this Wikipedia article, for what it's worth). A Google search didn't seem to reveal any notable references beyond those. Yaron K. (talk) 01:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:12, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:12, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as there's nothing particularly better from my searches, the current article is still questionable for notability at best. SwisterTwister talk 19:10, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.