Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAIV Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SAIV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As said by the users, article is a notable stub which requires expansion so I am keeping it. @Spinningspark: you showed interest in the expansion and improvement of this article please go ahead (non-admin closure) Anoptimistix "Message Me" 04:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SAIV

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTDICT as well as WP:V due to a lack of reliable sourcing. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:26, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:26, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I declined this for prod because WP:BEFORE shows the topic is capable of expansion into a decent article. It is covered in detail in several books and papers;

and is mentioned in many more. SpinningSpark 22:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The current woeful state of the article notwithstanding, this topic is the subject of significant scholarly research. In addition to Spinningspark's sources, a Google Scholar search and JSTOR search both show that there is notability under our guidelines. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:56, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.