Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rule Based DFM analysis - DHD Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rule_Based_DFM_analysis_-_DHD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#G5. Blocked user recreated the article with a different account. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rule Based DFM analysis - DHD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be more of an essay than an encyclopaedic article, mainly from the tone Mdann52 (talk) 15:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 15:36, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 15:36, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete...I agree with above, also the stats say that it has been viewed zero times in the 90 days prior to this nomination. This article is not notable and has no informational value to Wiki users.--RAF910 (talk) 15:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.