Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruddy Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ruddy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was link to wiktionary. Already covered there: wiktionary:ruddy. czar 05:12, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ruddy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This looks more suitable for Wiktionary as all it does is define the word and mention some usages. Doug Weller talk 10:39, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:27, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:27, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:27, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not a dictionary. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:29, 24 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
• Transwiki to Wikitionary as per nom. J947 00:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.