Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Router clustering Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Router_clustering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Router clustering (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A technology that is patented and used only by a single networking company, FatPipe Networks, which doesn't have an article itself and I could find no reliable sources discussing it (an article used to exist, created by the same user, but was deleted under CSD G11). The technology also doesn't appear to have had wider impact on the design of routers, based on a cursory Google Scholar search for the name, which mostly comes up with patents and unrelated uses of the term. Dcoetzee 21:24, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The article doesn't even attempt to establish notability. Of the two references in the article, one is to a patent that doesn't even use the word "cluster" in either the title or abstract. The other reference is to a free dictionary that defines it using almost identical text to that in Wikipedia, so either it is just copied from WP or the WP text is a copy-vio. Google search turned up very little to suggest that the concept is notable. CodeTheorist (talk) 21:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - REsults for router clustering that I found do not appear to be related to this technology. -- Whpq (talk) 15:39, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no evidence of notability found. --Kvng (talk) 13:32, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.