Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robot Runtime Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robot_Runtime

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 18:21, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Robot Runtime

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEO, WP:ONEDAY. Prod removed by Spawnvc, an editor name strikingly similar to that of the then-blocked creator, Spawnvcdotcom. Worldbruce (talk) 15:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:59, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 15:43, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 04:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An unreferenced article describing a basis for billing robot activity. Forum posts indicate there to be a setting of this name on some Kuka robots, but I am seeing nothing to confirm it as a basis utilised in the role described. Fails WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.