Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retractable screen Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Retractable_screen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to window screen. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:39, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retractable screen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. I could find sources to show it exists, but not that it is notable, and this is not a dictionary. Boleyn (talk) 12:45, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to window screen; sounds like a topic that deserves a mention in that article, but not its own article due to a lack of significance or even content to write about. I'd propose a merge, but the article is unsourced. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 21:22, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Swarm ^{we ♥ our hive} 07:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 13:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to window screen; add brief description to window screen article and to screen door explaining that retractable screens may be installed on screen doors, citing sources such as this 2005 source and this 2003 source. --Djembayz (talk) 18:09, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.