Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Research Systems Unix Group Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Research_Systems_Unix_Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. can't merge if its unsourced Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Research Systems Unix Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GROUP. Software developed (other articles) have similar problems, but I'll hold off on AfDing them until a discussion of this article is complete. Bbb23 (talk) 16:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:42, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - At least one of their projects (Fugu (software)) appears to be potentially notable but I find no independent mention of the group. --Kvng (talk) 17:49, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to University of Michigan. —Ruud 14:19, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or merge/redirect as lacking in-depth coverage by independent third party sources. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:41, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.