Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rename method Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rename_method

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rename method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

trivial piece of jargon. neither the content (a couple of paragraphs of prescriptive advice) nor the title (which isn't in a grammatical format) are worth merging to refactoring (the ostensible parent), which already contains the single bullet point that encapsulates this whole subject. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:34, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOTMANUAL. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete there's no there there; "Rename Method" was a title used in 1 book in 1999. The general concept of renaming a method is just part of Code refactoring. Extract class should probably also go away. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.