Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remote access router Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Remote_access_router

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 12:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remote access router (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I nominated this as a speedy A1 but it was declined. Following that I decided to skip prod and bring it here for discussion. The article consists of a single sentence, and it does not adequately explain what the subject is about. (That is, I still don't know how a "remote access router" is different from a router in general). I tried searching for this phrase on google and could not find any specific coverage of this phrase -- most of the links that were returned were discussing "remote access" (remote administration) features of a router, which does not appear to be the same meaning. So, based on a cursory lack of verifiability, lack of context, and no assertion of notability, I am nominating the article for deletion, though if someone can provide more information about this subject I would also support a merge to router. Ham Pastrami (talk) 22:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:N. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:36, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom unless some source can be found, in which case Merge with Router. --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 06:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - the single sentence, such as it is appears to have been orignally copied from here -- Whpq (talk) 20:16, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - poorly written but is a real term covered by reliable sources such as noted by Whpq (who wants the article deleted). Presumptive (talk) 05:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - sorry, I should have explained better myself better. I am making no judgement on the notability of the subject, whether it is to be a stand-alone article or merged to Router. Rather, what little text there is that constitutes the entire article has been copied and is thus a copyvio. -- Whpq (talk) 12:03, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Leave a redirect so that maybe it will not be recreated. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:35, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.