Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reflex (programming language) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Reflex_(programming_language)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reflex (programming language)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had tagged this as CSD A11(made up/found by page creator) but it was validly removed. I cannot find any independent reliable sources covering this programming language in depth; googling it only brings up YouTube videos of presentations of this language(which I presume were made by those creating it) and other brief mentions(like announcements of said presenations) 331dot (talk) 10:14, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We're an encyclopedia, not a preprint server. This is a notable language, but it's too early as yet to say anything about it. Not even whether it will last out the week (What happened to Hack (programming language)?

Note too that it isn't RefleX (programming language) - that one's different. I think Ryan Trinkle's Reflex is another different one too. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:45, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it might very well be notable some day, but way too soon. Wikipedia should not cover anything "currently" until it has been done enough that someone outside of it has written something. W Nowicki (talk) 20:09, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.