Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RedisGraph Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/RedisGraph

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:51, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RedisGraph

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product (literally released today). The article is solely based on self-published sources and press releases. A quick search on Google did only reveal more press releases, 1-2 passing mentions in trade magazines, affiliated websites, and PR platforms, and other obvious PR activities such as listings and name dropping on forums. The article is a promotional announcement and far too soon. GermanJoe (talk) 22:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 22:12, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable, secondary sources. Citrivescence (talk) 06:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 13:57, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is way WP:TOOSOON notability is not there are no secondary sources that meet WP:GNG requirements. Dom from Paris (talk) 18:43, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.