Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rational Automation Framework Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rational_Automation_Framework

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nominated by a sockpuppet. If you would like to change this article into a redirect, go ahead and Be Bold. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC) Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rational Automation Framework (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of independent notability. BarleyButt (talk) 22:21, 13 November 2022 (UTC) (sock strike Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 17 November 2022 (UTC))[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 22:25, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I have removed some content placed before the article's proper lede. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 22:27, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of IBM products#Middleware and applications, does not appear to pass WP:NPRODUCT, the only coverage in the article or that I could find from a search was in the form of blogs and online stores, and what little there is appears to be routine coverage of product launches. Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:56, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.