Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RagTime (computer program) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/RagTime_(computer_program)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 20:11, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RagTime (computer program) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article lacks notability. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:06, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up a borderline RS, http://www.educationupdate.com/archives/2004/july/html/tech-comgrafix.htm, and a number of reprinted press releases. This level of coverage is insufficient to establish notability, but suggests there may be other refs including print publications from the late 1990s that cover this software. Dialectric (talk) 18:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Thirty year old software should be leaving a bigger footprint if it's really notable. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.