Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum protocol Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Quantum_protocol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G1 Patent nonsence, meaningless or incomprehensible) by RHaworth

Quantum protocol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A Google search for the term "Quantum protocol" comes up with any number of things that go by this nomenclature. The thing this page describes doesn't fall into any of those categories, and can only be considered to be something made up by the author. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete complete incoherent gibberish VarunFEB2003 13:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete G1. Although this uses words that individually have meaning, the content as a whole most certainly does not. This editor's contributions have been uniformly similarly unhelpful. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:01, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:52, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:52, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.