Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QtRuby Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/QtRuby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Qt (software)#Language bindings. as a viable ATD. A discussion on whether any material should be merged can be handled editorially and doesn't require a relist Star Mississippi 23:31, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

QtRuby

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is primarily about the software library https://github.com/KDE/qtruby which has been dead since 2013, and secondarily about any Ruby bindings for Qt, which are all now dead. Wikipedia seems to generally be lenient in enforcing notability policy for open-source software projects, but notability isn't established by the currently-cited sources. A determined editor could probably dig up some ancient reviews in a WP:BEFORE search, but I'm content that Wikipedia is not lacking as an encyclopedia by not having this article. Daask (talk) 21:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Daask (talk) 21:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nowhere near notable enough for an article. Sgubaldo (talk) 13:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: trimmed (2-3 sentences max len), properly sourced material into Qt (software)#Language bindings. As it stands this is an unnneeded CFORK, a proper merge will improve the target. // Timothy :: talk 16:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.