Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QPHP Framework (2nd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/QPHP_Framework_(2nd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

QPHP Framework

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think it has enough notability. –ebraminio^talk 12:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I found nothing to question nominator's concern. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 19:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Nothing pops up in the way of significant sources, so this framework does not seem to meet WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG. Even if there are sources available, meeting the significance requirement of WP:NSOFT seems doubtable given the feature list. -- BenTels (talk) 00:31, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.