- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 12:31, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- PythonTeX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable piece of software, written about in a rather promotional tone. Sources are affiliated; first source is a paper from the Python in Science (SciPy) conference that has not yet been cited according to GScholar. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The worst promotional content ("fast, user-friendly access to Python from within LaTeX") was removed. What remains is the issue of notability, which has not been established as per WP:GNG. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. I found some brief independent coverage in a 2013 book [1], but that's about it. Perhaps this was created too soon. I think it could be merged/mentioned somewhere using that wp:secondary source. Probably a brief mention at TeX, although I think a spin-off list article (List of TeX libraries?) should be create at some point. There's a lot of non-core TeX stuff that could be covered from secondary sources, but probably isn't notable enough by itself (though stuff like pstricks, TIPA (software) etc. seems to have their own pages, not all of which are probably justified.) Someone not using his real name (talk) 10:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.