mic_none

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Push development Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Push_development

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Push development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-encyclopedic essay, not an encyclopedia article. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:09, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete An essay, original research and synthesis from the few sources cited, with no sources to support the core of the article: explaining what push development is (if it is at all a prevailing concept rather than one writer's notion—and a Google search indicates that it isn't a prevailing concept, at least not under the name "push development"). It makes arguments and pronouncements. Not a neutral reference article. Largoplazo (talk) 22:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:14, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.