Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychotechnology Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Psychotechnology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be restored if transwiki is desired. Sandstein 10:12, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Psychotechnology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

tagged since October 2013[1] for a move to wiktionary, but still here. It should be either moved or untagged. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:28, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:34, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:34, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:34, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Transwikify. Doesn't seem like it's a topic that would be expanded in the article, and definitely fits more in to Wikitionary than here. Kingofaces43 (talk) 20:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a dictdef; nothing that needs moving to Wiktionary. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.