Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProcessPro Software Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ProcessPro_Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:48, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ProcessPro Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the provided sources are in PR/business-churnalism publications. An internet search didn't return anything better. Awards won don't appear to be notable. Does not meet WP:NORG. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:22, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:57, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:57, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:54, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:45, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.