Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProcessModel Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ProcessModel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 14:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ProcessModel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This content was repeatedly declined as a draft, as there's no in-depth coverage in the citations provided. Please see the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk for detailed information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:58, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 04:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mifter (talk) 00:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - cannot find enough on this to show that it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.