Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powerpaste Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Powerpaste

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Powerpaste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I did a quick search and could not find enough secondary sources to show notability Chidgk1 (talk) 07:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I only found a trademarked cleaning paste with the same name. At best too soon,. May never be notable, it will need to impact the marketplace first.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.