Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polyarc reactor Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Polyarc_reactor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 08:38, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Polyarc reactor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article reads primarily as an advertisement for a the polyarc reactor. I think that it is sufficient to give it a mention in Gas chromatography#Detectors. Chenomic (talk) 23:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:44, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• The subject that this is part of is derivatization, specifically post-column. Uncle G (talk) 12:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:14, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The article subject is a bit niche, but is notable in Wikipedia definition. The first page of Google (search linked above) turns enough good sources to demonstrate notability, but if needed I can pick a few specific ones. Anton.bersh (talk) 19:05, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is an article about a particular company's product, using the trade name. If there is a generic name, the article could be rewritten without mentioning the company, except possibly as an external link.. Otherwise ithe key content could be integrated into either flame ionization detector or if necessary gas chromatography (GC) DGG ( talk ) 18:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 23:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge into Flame ionization detector. It's already mentioned there, and it's just a method for enhancing the function of the detector. There's undue coverage of the item by having its own page (and Polyarc is a trademarked name).— rsjaffe 🗣️ 05:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Gas chromatography#Detectors: Add it as a specific method on the general page. Gusfriend (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.