Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plant Design System Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Plant_Design_System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:50, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plant Design System

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I thought about this for quite a while, but this article is mostly a plug for a piece of software by Intergraph. The references are various links to product pages and the article is more or less the same. I think the general idea of plant design software may meet WP:GNG this article would have to be completely blanked to not be promotional, and if it wasn't created 4 years ago might meet CSD G11. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 08:27, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree with nom. I think this article represents kind of sneaky attempt to have it both ways with an article that ostensibly is about a broad concept but in fact is an improperly sourced plug for a particular product. Sources offered don't establish notability for either the product or the concept and Googling didn't turn up anything better. Msnicki (talk) 15:18, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found no sinificant coverage of the subject – Intergraph SmartPlant 3D. The fact that the article name implies different subject changes nothing in this regard. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 00:06, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was unable to find independent in depth RS regarding this Intergraph product and there were also no RS regarding the term in a more general setting. There is a short blurb on plant design at Chemical engineering#Plant design, but I would recommend against a redirect, as this term is a proper noun for the Intergraph product. With no RS, this topic fails WP:GNG and should be deleted. --Mark viking (talk) 00:36, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found no significant coverage. This software is non-notable per WP:N. SL93 (talk) 00:09, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.