Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piggy bank cryptography Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Piggy_bank_cryptography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Piggy bank cryptography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable idea from cryptography. A search of Google Scholar turns up only one mention in a journal article; the remaining sources are preprints on arxiv and thus unreliable. Does not pass the notability requirement for coverage in multiple reliable sources. BenKuykendall (talk) 01:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. BenKuykendall (talk) 01:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. BenKuykendall (talk) 01:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable but if feel the content is relevant - add it to another page about Cryptography. Doesn't require its own. MaskedSinger (talk) 09:27, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.