Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Picoponics Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Picoponics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 06:40, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picoponics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like this topic lacks notability, it's maybe even made-up. Google search returns very few hits [1] non of which contain significant coverage. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:33, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:07, 19 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete. Does not seem to be distinct enough from Hydroponics. Gccwang (talk) 20:25, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 20. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 04:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Found no coverage. No evidence that this is even a widely used term. --Michig (talk) 14:36, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.