Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhysicsFS Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PhysicsFS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:46, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PhysicsFS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:RS in current state. Usage examples have been either deleted in previous AfDs for lack of notability, or link to other editable encyclopedias (not including Allegro), which link back to the primary source for reference. This page would need to be improved a lot to meet the quality standards. Article was created in 2011. WubTheCaptain (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2016 (UTC) (edited: 15:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WubTheCaptain (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WubTheCaptain (talk) 15:34, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as there's nothing establishing both independent notability and substance, nothing for applicable notability also. SwisterTwister talk 03:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete sources just not that it exists and was used a handful of times. Not close to depth needed for separate article. W Nowicki (talk) 20:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.