Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Performance testing Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Performance_testing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was convert to disambiguation page.  Sandstein  05:44, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Performance testing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for no sources since 2007; it's not at all clear that there's a notable topic here. Perhaps a disambig page though... Dicklyon (talk) 03:37, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eh - the article is crap, but there is an actual notable subject there that's more than just software performance testing. Not sure if that merits deletion or not. Argyriou (talk) 03:52, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and re-write The article is poorly written, but it's not crap. It needs references but it's an extremely notable subject in software testing. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's already a Software performance testing, also tagged for no refs, with a lot of real content. That's why I said maybe a disambig. Books show all sorts of performance testing, but it's not clear which, if any, fit the topic as described in this stub; some articles like engineering performance testing, sports performance testing, human performance testing, motor oil performance testing, etc. are all possibilities. But what do we do for now? Dicklyon (talk) 05:06, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Appears to be essentially a disambiguation page from which most of the entries should be removed, but still a reasonable search term for at least 2 or 3 of the linked articles. --Michig (talk) 06:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep The nomination does not seem to be proposing deletion. AFD is not cleanup. Warden (talk) 10:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Convert to disambig The page has no real content and would be better used as a disambig page pointing to more specific pages such as Software performance testing .--ben_b (talk) 22:52, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.