Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parallel Genome Assembly Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Parallel_Genome_Assembly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:40, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Parallel Genome Assembly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:FRINGE scientific 'hypothesis' cited solely to a PR release and a pre-publication article by its claimant. No indication that this specific hypothesis (as opposed to unrelated uses of the phrase "Parallel Genome Assembly") has received any notice in the scientific literature. Only third-party hit I could find is to Mun, Johnathan (2003). Faith Journey. City: Xulon Press. ISBN 1591606578. -- which is hardly a WP:RS for scientific claims. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 05:37, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete. This sounds almost like pseudoscience by Olga Lepeshinskaya to me ("Complex Animals and Plants Originated from Prebiotic Chemistry" [1]), but who cares? Biophys (talk) 13:07, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 07:43, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.