Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PacketProtector Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PacketProtector

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (or someone can be BOLD and just merge it) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PacketProtector

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to lack significant independent coverage required by WP:GNG. Article created and maintained by a WP:SPA. FuFoFuEd (talk) 10:16, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak Keep~~ Merge with OpenWrt quick search finds refs [1]~~[2]~~ Widefox (talk) 15:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the find, but that's only one ref. The 2nd page is just some mashup web site that eventually redirects to the first (linux.com). FuFoFuEd (talk) 17:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

yes, updated Widefox (talk) 21:23, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

changed opinion based on only 1 reference, plus some checking. Could easily merge instead of waiting for topic to be possibly notable. Widefox (talk) 19:40, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:43, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.