Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PHP Data Objects (2nd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PHP_Data_Objects_(2nd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:03, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PHP Data Objects

see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PHP Data Objects. Misterdiscreet 00:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm sorry, but I just don't see the encyclopedic nature of this. Perhaps I'm mistaken, but this just seems to be a part of PHP, if it's that important, make it a section there. FrozenPurpleCube 00:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Although it is not a part of PHP, it doesn't seem notable and doesn't cite any references. If it cited some references and completely rewritten, then it could be a decent article. — Wenli 01:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete as non-notable and unreferenced -- per User:Wenli, however, there might be a sentence or two worth merging into PHP itself. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 03:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Very notable web programming technology. Reliable sources covering this subject include O'Reilly Networks - ONLamp, IBM DeveloperWorks (twice), IBM Redbooks, php|architect, InfoWorld, Linux Journal, ... there's no shortage of sources for this subject. As to making this a section in the PHP article, this is as much a part of PHP as, for instance, ADO.NET is a part of the Microsoft .NET Framework. Yes, they're technologies that depend on each other and are shipped together, but they deserve separate discussion. JulesH 10:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, maybe ADO.NET should be deleted as well. Or at least, merged with the .Net Framework. FrozenPurpleCube 14:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not encyclopedic, practically unmaintainable. Pavel Vozenilek 12:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.