Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operating System Embedded Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Operating_System_Embedded

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to ENEA AB. There is unanimous consensus to merge (selectively) to the other article. For attribution purposes, the article cannot be deleted. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Operating System Embedded (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are two articles (this one and ENEA AB) with barely enough sources to support one. I think this should be the one to go, and advocate a smerge, but this is old (2012) so it needs proper discussion. Guy (help! - typo?) 20:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:21, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this one with a merge of information to the other. Balle010 (talk) 01:22, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this one with a merge of information to the other. Nixdorf (talk) 20:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.